On January 17, 2019, the Federal Court of Appeal heard the Attorney General of Canada’s appeal from a judicial review that quashed a Board decision that it has jurisdiction over Galderma’s DIFFERIN (0.1% adapalene). Our report on the Federal Court decision, 2017 FC 1023, is found here. Innovative Medicines Canada intervened in the appeal. The Federal Court of Appeal reserved judgment.
Related Publications & Articles
-
New PMPRB Draft Guidelines outline administrative process for excessive price hearing recommendations
On December 19, 2024, the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) released its Draft Guidelines for PMPRB Staff regarding Administrative Process for Excessive Price Hearing Recommendation (Draft...Read More -
Competition Tribunal refuses JAMP leave to commence ustekinumab abuse of dominance application
JAMP launched JAMTEKI, its ustekinumab biosimilar of STELARA, on March 1, 2024. Janssen launched its second branded ustekinumab product, FINLIUS, on July 2, 2024. JAMP commenced its application for ...Read More -
Federal Court rules on patent listing again, confirms generic not required to address patent submitted before ANDS filing but listed after
On January 20, 2025, Justice O’Reilly of the Federal Court dismissed Bayer’s judicial review of the Minister of Health’s decision to list Canadian Patent No. 2,970,315 (315 Patent) on the Patent Regis...Read More