On September 29, 2021, the Attorney General of Canada sought leave to appeal a decision of the Federal Court of Appeal (2021 FCA 157) setting aside the decision of the Federal Court dismissing Alexion’s application for judicial review, and remitting the matter to the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (Board). The Federal Court of Appeal expressed concerns with both the adequacy of the Board’s reasons and the substantive reasonableness of its reasons in determining that Alexion’s SOLIRIS (eculizumab) was sold at an excessive price.
On March 24, 2022, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the Attorney General of Canada’s application for leave to appeal (Docket No. 39858).
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact a member of the Pharmaceutical Litigation Group.
The preceding is intended as a timely update on Canadian intellectual property and technology law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. To obtain such advice, please communicate with our offices directly.
Related Publications & Articles
-
FCA sets aside PMPRB’s order that Galderma’s patent claiming 0.3% adapalene “pertained to” 0.1% adapalene DIFFERIN
On December 3, 2024, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) set aside the order of the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB or Board) that had required Galderma to continue to provide information t...Read More -
Class actions relating to opioid use disorder continue across Canada
There are multiple ongoing class actions in Canada against pharmaceutical companies related to Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) and its effects.Read More -
Federal Court finds patent ineligible for listing against SNDS
In Bayer Inc v Amgen Canada Inc, 2024 FC 1849, the Court granted a motion brought by Amgen for a declaration that Canadian Patent No. 3,007,276 (276 patent) was ineligible for inclusion on the Patent ...Read More