Supreme Court denies leave in infliximab patent infringement action
On January 8, 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave to Janssen and Kennedy Trust (Docket No. 39099) with respect to the
Federal Court of Appeal’s decision remitting to the trial judge the reconsideration of issues of obviousness and anticipation (as previously reported).
Amgen seeks leave to appeal decision invalidating its filgrastim patent
As previously reported, the Federal Court of Appeal had dismissed Amgen’s appeal from a decision invalidating claims of a patent relating to filgrastim (Amgen’s NEUPOGEN and Pfizer’s biosimilar product NIVESTYM). On January 4, 2021, Amgen applied to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal (Docket No. 39530).
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact a member of the Pharmaceutical Litigation Group.
The preceding is intended as a timely update on Canadian intellectual property and technology law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. To obtain such advice, please communicate with our offices directly.
Related Publications & Articles
-
Competition Tribunal refuses JAMP leave to commence ustekinumab abuse of dominance application
JAMP launched JAMTEKI, its ustekinumab biosimilar of STELARA, on March 1, 2024. Janssen launched its second branded ustekinumab product, FINLIUS, on July 2, 2024. JAMP commenced its application for ...Read More -
Federal Court rules on patent listing again, confirms generic not required to address patent submitted before ANDS filing but listed after
On January 20, 2025, Justice O’Reilly of the Federal Court dismissed Bayer’s judicial review of the Minister of Health’s decision to list Canadian Patent No. 2,970,315 (315 Patent) on the Patent Regis...Read More -
SCC to revisit “method of medical treatment” patent claims
This spring, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) will consider the scope of patentable subject-matter as it relates to “methods of medical treatment”.Read More