Supreme Court denies leave in infliximab patent infringement action
On January 8, 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave to Janssen and Kennedy Trust (Docket No. 39099) with respect to the
Federal Court of Appeal’s decision remitting to the trial judge the reconsideration of issues of obviousness and anticipation (as previously reported).
Amgen seeks leave to appeal decision invalidating its filgrastim patent
As previously reported, the Federal Court of Appeal had dismissed Amgen’s appeal from a decision invalidating claims of a patent relating to filgrastim (Amgen’s NEUPOGEN and Pfizer’s biosimilar product NIVESTYM). On January 4, 2021, Amgen applied to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal (Docket No. 39530).
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact a member of the Pharmaceutical Litigation Group.
The preceding is intended as a timely update on Canadian intellectual property and technology law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. To obtain such advice, please communicate with our offices directly.
Related Publications & Articles
-
FCA sets aside PMPRB’s order that Galderma’s patent claiming 0.3% adapalene “pertained to” 0.1% adapalene DIFFERIN
On December 3, 2024, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) set aside the order of the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB or Board) that had required Galderma to continue to provide information t...Read More -
Class actions relating to opioid use disorder continue across Canada
There are multiple ongoing class actions in Canada against pharmaceutical companies related to Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) and its effects.Read More -
Federal Court finds patent ineligible for listing against SNDS
In Bayer Inc v Amgen Canada Inc, 2024 FC 1849, the Court granted a motion brought by Amgen for a declaration that Canadian Patent No. 3,007,276 (276 patent) was ineligible for inclusion on the Patent ...Read More