The Federal Court struck Novo Nordisk’s judicial review application challenging the decision of the Minister of Health to accept for review an Abbreviated New Drug Submission (ANDS) filed by Teva Canada for its Teva-liraglutide product,
relying on Novo Nordisk’s VICTOZA (a biologic) as a Canadian reference product: Novo Nordisk Canada v Canada (Health) 2019 FC 822. In striking the application, the Court concluded that Novo Nordisk had neither direct nor public interest standing in the matter. In support of its argument for public interest standing, Novo Nordisk and the intervenor
BIOTECanada argued that the Minister of Health failed to apply the Biosimilars Guidance Document to Teva’s product, which requires
that a submission for approval of a biosimilar must be made by way of a New Drug Submission (NDS), rather than by an ANDS, and must satisfy a more stringent standard than an ANDS. The Court found, however, that it had not been established that Teva-liraglutide
was a biologic, as it could have been chemically synthesized; it was therefore speculative that the Minister departed from the Biosimilars Guidance Document. Furthermore, the Court held that it was speculative that the Minister had actually determined
that Teva’s submission is reviewable as an ANDS and capable of being approved by way of an ANDS, as the Minister of Health had only accepted the ANDS for review. Novo Nordisk may appeal as of right. Novo Nordisk has a pending action against Teva
under the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations relating to the same submission.
