The Industrial Design Office has announced that it is changing its practice with respect to industrial designs applied to buildings or structures.
Under the previous policy, designs applied to buildings or structures to be constructed on-site were not registrable because they were not considered to be “finished articles” to which a design may be applied. They were only registrable if the designs were capable of being “preformed, portable and delivered to purchasers as finished articles or in sections to be put together by a simple operation such as bolting”.
As of June 14, 2024, the Office will take the position that buildings and structures, including those constructed on-site, may be acceptable finished articles to which a design can be applied. The revised practice is applicable to all pending applications, regardless of their filing date.
The new policy is stated in section 13.02.03.04 of the Industrial Design Office Practice Manual.
This is a welcome development and the Office’s communication recognizes that “Broadening the scope of acceptable industrial design subject matter to include buildings and structures constructed on-site fosters and supports innovation and creativity by encouraging innovators in that industry to continue developing new designs for buildings and structures knowing that industrial design protection may be available.”
The change also aligns Canada with other jurisdictions, notably the United States, in which design patents are available for buildings and structures on-site. For example, Apple Inc. has obtained several patents for its building designs, including the cube design of its flagship store on Fifth Avenue in New York and its two-level store design in Joy City mall in China.
For more information, please contact a member of our Industrial Design practice group.
Related Publications & Articles
-
Avoiding a finding of ambiguity and ensuring patent validity: the importance of a comprehensive disclosure and defining coined terms
On June 7, 2024, the Federal Court issued its Judgment and Reasons in Tekna Plasma Systems Inc v AP&C Advanced Powders & Coatings Inc (2024 FC 871), finding all claims of the Defendant’s Canad...Read More -
Upcoming changes to Canada’s trademarks regime: what brand owners and their counsel need to know
On April 1, 2025, long-awaited amendments to Canada’s Trademarks Act and Trademarks Regulations will come into force. The purpose of the amendments is to discourage abuse of Canada’s trademarks regime...Read More -
When patents expire but royalty payments don’t: contrasting U.S. and Canadian approaches to patent licensing
How does the expiration of the patents in one jurisdiction impact global royalty payments? This question was addressed by the United States Court of Appeal’s Ninth Circuit in C.R. Bard Inc v Atrium Me...Read More