The Canadian government has published an amendment to the Patent Rules effective April 1, 2002. This amendment affects the due date for National Phase entry under Chapter I of the PCT.
Prior to April 1, 2002, the due date for entering the National Phase in Canada under Chapter I was 20 months from the priority date, extendible to 32 months on payment of a $200 late fee.
The amendment is now in effect, and the due date for entering the National Phase in Canada under Chapter I is now 30 months from the priority date, extendible to 42 months on payment of the aforementioned late fee.
The due date for entering the National Phase under Chapter II continues to be 30 months, extendible to 42 months on payment of the aforementioned late fee.
The amended rules prohibit entry into the National Phase under Chapter I in situations where, before April 1, 2002, 32 months have elapsed from the priority date. Since the Canadian Patent Office was closed on April 1, 2002, we believe that PCT applications designating Canada and having a priority date of July 29, 1999 or later can take advantage of the amended rules.
Related Publications & Articles
-
Avoiding a finding of ambiguity and ensuring patent validity: the importance of a comprehensive disclosure and defining coined terms
On June 7, 2024, the Federal Court issued its Judgment and Reasons in Tekna Plasma Systems Inc v AP&C Advanced Powders & Coatings Inc (2024 FC 871), finding all claims of the Defendant’s Canad...Read More -
Upcoming changes to Canada’s trademarks regime: what brand owners and their counsel need to know
On April 1, 2025, long-awaited amendments to Canada’s Trademarks Act and Trademarks Regulations will come into force. The purpose of the amendments is to discourage abuse of Canada’s trademarks regime...Read More -
When patents expire but royalty payments don’t: contrasting U.S. and Canadian approaches to patent licensing
How does the expiration of the patents in one jurisdiction impact global royalty payments? This question was addressed by the United States Court of Appeal’s Ninth Circuit in C.R. Bard Inc v Atrium Me...Read More