Prior to January 17, 2020, extensions of time were readily available during Canadian trademark prosecution. A single six-month extension could be secured without providing any substantive reasons. Further six-month extensions could be secured by demonstrating exceptional circumstances. That has now changed as a result of a January 17, 2020 Practice Notice.
Effective immediately, the Trademarks Office will not grant any extensions of time for office actions issued on or after January 17, 2020, unless exceptional circumstances are demonstrated.
As for what might constitute an exceptional circumstance, the Canadian Trademarks Office has expanded the list to include:
- A recent change in trademark agent
- Circumstances beyond the control of the person concerned (such as illness, accident, death, bankruptcy, or other serious and unforeseen circumstances)
- Transfer (there is a pending assignment that would overcome the citation)
- Opposition proceedings are pending against the cited mark
- Section 45 non-use cancellation proceedings are pending against the cited mark
- Official mark (the applicant is in the process of actively negotiating a consent from the holder of an official mark)
- Division of a Protocol application
- Responding to a substantive objection (such as a confusion objection, descriptiveness objection or inherent distinctiveness objection)
- Compiling evidence of distinctiveness
Of particular note, for responding to substantive objections (such as confusion objections, descriptiveness objections or inherent distinctiveness objections), a single six-month extension of time is available once during the life of the application. For example, if an applicant obtains a six-month extension of time to respond to a confusion objection in response to an earlier Examiner’s Report, it will not be possible to obtain a six-month extension of time to respond to a subsequent Examiner’s Report (unless there is a different exceptional circumstance).
For any outstanding Examiner’s Reports issued prior to January 17, 2020, it is still possible to secure a single six-month extension without providing any substantive reasons.
For further information, please contact a member of our Trademarks Practice Group.
The preceding is intended as a timely update on Canadian intellectual property and technology law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. To obtain such advice, please communicate with our offices directly.
Related Publications & Articles
-
Relief under Canada’s stringent “due care” standard for missed maintenance fees? Federal Court requires CIPO to consider events beyond the final opportunity for correction
In Matco Tools Corporation v Canada (Attorney General), 2025 FC 118 (Matco Tools), the Federal Court found that a decision by the Commissioner of Patents to refuse to reinstate a patent application fo...Read More -
Navigating unity of invention and double patenting issues: practical strategies for patent protection in Canada
In this article, we discuss practical strategies for navigating unity of invention and double patenting issues in Canada, tailored towards specific objectives for patent protection in Canada.Read More -
Avoiding the hindsight trap in the context of a patent obviousness analysis
This article examines two strategies to proactively mitigate the influence of hindsight when assessing obviousness. We rely on insight from recent Canadian decisions and decisions from the United King...Read More