Prior to January 17, 2020, extensions of time were readily available during Canadian trademark prosecution. A single six-month extension could be secured without providing any substantive reasons. Further six-month extensions could be secured by demonstrating exceptional circumstances. That has now changed as a result of a January 17, 2020 Practice Notice.
Effective immediately, the Trademarks Office will not grant any extensions of time for office actions issued on or after January 17, 2020, unless exceptional circumstances are demonstrated.
As for what might constitute an exceptional circumstance, the Canadian Trademarks Office has expanded the list to include:
- A recent change in trademark agent
- Circumstances beyond the control of the person concerned (such as illness, accident, death, bankruptcy, or other serious and unforeseen circumstances)
- Transfer (there is a pending assignment that would overcome the citation)
- Opposition proceedings are pending against the cited mark
- Section 45 non-use cancellation proceedings are pending against the cited mark
- Official mark (the applicant is in the process of actively negotiating a consent from the holder of an official mark)
- Division of a Protocol application
- Responding to a substantive objection (such as a confusion objection, descriptiveness objection or inherent distinctiveness objection)
- Compiling evidence of distinctiveness
Of particular note, for responding to substantive objections (such as confusion objections, descriptiveness objections or inherent distinctiveness objections), a single six-month extension of time is available once during the life of the application. For example, if an applicant obtains a six-month extension of time to respond to a confusion objection in response to an earlier Examiner’s Report, it will not be possible to obtain a six-month extension of time to respond to a subsequent Examiner’s Report (unless there is a different exceptional circumstance).
For any outstanding Examiner’s Reports issued prior to January 17, 2020, it is still possible to secure a single six-month extension without providing any substantive reasons.
For further information, please contact a member of our Trademarks Practice Group.
The preceding is intended as a timely update on Canadian intellectual property and technology law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. To obtain such advice, please communicate with our offices directly.
Related Publications & Articles
-
Avoiding a finding of ambiguity and ensuring patent validity: the importance of a comprehensive disclosure and defining coined terms
On June 7, 2024, the Federal Court issued its Judgment and Reasons in Tekna Plasma Systems Inc v AP&C Advanced Powders & Coatings Inc (2024 FC 871), finding all claims of the Defendant’s Canad...Read More -
Upcoming changes to Canada’s trademarks regime: what brand owners and their counsel need to know
On April 1, 2025, long-awaited amendments to Canada’s Trademarks Act and Trademarks Regulations will come into force. The purpose of the amendments is to discourage abuse of Canada’s trademarks regime...Read More -
When patents expire but royalty payments don’t: contrasting U.S. and Canadian approaches to patent licensing
How does the expiration of the patents in one jurisdiction impact global royalty payments? This question was addressed by the United States Court of Appeal’s Ninth Circuit in C.R. Bard Inc v Atrium Me...Read More