On December 9, 2017 Canada’s Governor-in-Council took the formal step of publishing proposed new Industrial Design Regulations (the proposed Regulations) in the Canadian Gazette. A 30-day consultation period has been set, ending January 9, 2018.
Canada’s Industrial Design Act and Regulations are being amended to allow Canada to join the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs (the Hague Agreement). The Hague Agreement provides a mechanism for registering an industrial design in several countries by means of a single application, filed in one language, with one set of fees, resulting in cost and time savings.
The new Industrial Design Act has been finalized. With the publication in the Canada Gazette, the text of the proposed Regulations is now one step closer to being finalized. The most recent forecast from the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) suggests that the new law implementing the Hague Agreement will come into force in early 2019.
The proposed Regulations provide considerable detail outlining how Canada will adhere to the Hague Agreement and closely track the version published for consultation on June 19, 2017, which we reported on here, with the differences substantially being formal in nature. However some more substantive changes were made in response to the consultation. The proposed Regulations provide applicants more flexibility in their industrial design filing strategy over the current regime. Highlights include:
Designs disclosed but not originally claimed can now be protected: The proposed Regulations provide that a design disclosed but not claimed can be pursued by filing a divisional application for that design. Under the current regime, there is no mechanism for pursuing a design not claimed in the original application. However, the timeframe for filing divisional applications will be more limited than in the current regime.
More options for illustrating and claiming the design: The proposed Regulations allow the application to contain both drawings and photographs, in contrast to the current regime where either, but not both, are permitted. There is also the possibility of the representation of the design being any other visual reproduction specified by CIPO. The proposed Regulations continue the practice of allowing dotted or broken lines to identify unclaimed features, but now also allows the use of colouring for this purpose, which was not in the June consultation document.
Set form of the application abolished: The form of the application is not mandated in the proposed Regulations, eliminating the need for the application to contain proscribed statements. A description of the design has also been made optional.
We will provide further updates following the end of the public comment period and prior to the final implementation of the new industrial design law in Canada.
If you have questions concerning the changes and their impact, or would like assistance in submitting comments please contact any member of our Industrial Designs Group.
The preceding is intended as a timely update on Canadian intellectual property and technology law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. To obtain such advice, please communicate with our offices directly.
Related Publications & Articles
-
Avoiding a finding of ambiguity and ensuring patent validity: the importance of a comprehensive disclosure and defining coined terms
On June 7, 2024, the Federal Court issued its Judgment and Reasons in Tekna Plasma Systems Inc v AP&C Advanced Powders & Coatings Inc (2024 FC 871), finding all claims of the Defendant’s Canad...Read More -
Upcoming changes to Canada’s trademarks regime: what brand owners and their counsel need to know
On April 1, 2025, long-awaited amendments to Canada’s Trademarks Act and Trademarks Regulations will come into force. The purpose of the amendments is to discourage abuse of Canada’s trademarks regime...Read More -
When patents expire but royalty payments don’t: contrasting U.S. and Canadian approaches to patent licensing
How does the expiration of the patents in one jurisdiction impact global royalty payments? This question was addressed by the United States Court of Appeal’s Ninth Circuit in C.R. Bard Inc v Atrium Me...Read More