In a public decision dated August 8, 2024, Justice Furlanetto of the Federal Court found Boehringer Ingelheim’s Canadian Patent No. 2,591,083 (the 083 patent) valid and infringed by JAMP in an action under the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations relating to OFEV® (nintedanib): Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd v JAMP Pharma Corporation, 2024 FC 1198.
The 083 patent relates to the use of nintedanib and its esylate salt in the prevention or treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) – a rare, chronic and incurable lung disease that typically leads to respiratory failure and death.
The Court found that the 083 patent is not invalid for anticipation, double patenting, lack of sound prediction of utility or obviousness. In particular, the 083 patent provided the skilled person with a sound prediction of utility that was “more than mere speculation or hypothesis, but one grounded in the accepted in vivo model for evaluating potential efficacy”.
In addition, the Court concluded that JAMP’s import and sale of JAMP Nintedanib is sufficient to constitute direct infringement of the 083 claims that are directed to the medicine (nintedanib esylate) and pharmaceutical composition of the medicine for use in the prevention or treatment of IPF. JAMP had stipulated that it would induce infringement of the 083 claims.
With respect to the second patent at issue relating to a formulation of nintedanib esylate (Canadian Patent No. 2,726,267), the Court found that JAMP Nintedanib does not infringe the asserted claims and declined to consider the invalidity defences raised by JAMP.
Boehringer Ingelheim was successfully represented by a trial team from Smart & Biggar, including J. Sheldon Hamilton, Nancy Pei, Urszula Wojtyra, Katie Lee, Chen Li, Malcolm Harvey and Ryan Wong.
Either party may appeal as of right.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact a member of the Pharmaceutical Litigation Group.
The preceding is intended as a timely update on Canadian intellectual property and life sciences regulatory law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. To obtain such advice, please communicate with our offices directly.
Related Publications & Articles
-
Federal Court rules on patent listing again, confirms generic not required to address patent submitted before ANDS filing but listed after
On January 20, 2025, Justice O’Reilly of the Federal Court dismissed Bayer’s judicial review of the Minister of Health’s decision to list Canadian Patent No. 2,970,315 (315 Patent) on the Patent Regis...Read More -
Minister of Health announces new bilateral agreements with provinces for rare disease drugs
Canada’s first-ever National Strategy for Drugs for Rare Diseases includes up to $1.4 billion in funding for provinces and territories, to be negotiated through bilateral agreements.Read More -
SCC to revisit “method of medical treatment” patent claims
This spring, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) will consider the scope of patentable subject-matter as it relates to “methods of medical treatment”.Read More