As previously reported, the Ontario Court of Appeal (ONCA) granted Sanofi and Schering leave to amend their defences to plead the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in AstraZeneca Canada Inc. v Apotex Inc., 2017 SCC 36 (“AstraZeneca”). In the underlying action, Apotex relies on Sanofi-Aventis Canada v Apotex Inc., 2009 FC 676 (“invalidity decision”) as a central element of its novel claims under the Ontario Statute of Monopolies, U.K. Statute of Monopolies and Trade-Marks Act. The invalidity decision found certain claims of Canadian Patent No. 1,341,206 invalid on the basis of the “promise doctrine”, which was subsequently rejected as “unsound” in AstraZeneca. The ONCA concluded that depriving Sanofi and Schering of the opportunity to argue that the invalidity decision is suspect would be “fundamentally unfair”. On January 7, 2019, Apotex applied for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada (docket No. 38471).
Related Publications & Articles
-
2024 highlights in Canadian life sciences IP and regulatory law
In 2024, the Rx IP Update team at Smart & Biggar reported on a number of developments in Canadian life sciences IP and regulatory law.Read More -
Competition Tribunal refuses JAMP leave to commence ustekinumab abuse of dominance application
JAMP launched JAMTEKI, its ustekinumab biosimilar of STELARA, on March 1, 2024. Janssen launched its second branded ustekinumab product, FINLIUS, on July 2, 2024. JAMP commenced its application for ...Read More -
Federal Court rules on patent listing again, confirms generic not required to address patent submitted before ANDS filing but listed after
On January 20, 2025, Justice O’Reilly of the Federal Court dismissed Bayer’s judicial review of the Minister of Health’s decision to list Canadian Patent No. 2,970,315 (315 Patent) on the Patent Regis...Read More